I became a parent a year and a half ago, and my life changed
forever. When I was pregnant lots of parents gave me advice (Enjoy going to the
grocery store by yourself while you still can! Go out on dates! Clean your
house!). One even warned me that becoming a parent would “rock my world.” I
thought I understood. I thought I was prepared for the huge change coming. And
while I wasn’t unprepared, I really had no idea exactly how life-changing
becoming a parent would be. Now I try to explain to my friends who don’t have
children what exactly getting swept into parenthood felt like, and the best I
have come up with is this—I had my daughter and she was more wonderful than I
could have imagined, and the rest of my life fell into chaos. One of those
pieces of my life was my relationship with my husband. We look at each other
and marvel that we used to sit around on the weekend and lament that we did not
know what to do with ourselves. Now we would give anything to learn the secret
to freezing time. Now we try to hold on as life rushes by. Now I tell my
husband we need more time and he agrees but asks, “what time?”
Showing posts with label Social perception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social perception. Show all posts
Thursday, September 3, 2015
Monday, April 7, 2014
4 Reasons Not to Settle in a Relationship
Posted by
Juli
Settling is an ugly, depressing word. Few
people would suggest outright that you should settle for less than you want and
deserve in a relationship. Even Lori Gottlieb, author of Marry Him:
The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough, disapproved of the
use of the word in her book title, a decision she said was made by her publisher.
But
the pressure to settle can be very real, even if it is not communicated
explicitly. People who are single after a certain age may be seen as "too
picky" and urged to lower their standards. Singles are also likely to face
social stigma due to their solo status, a phenomenon psychologist Bella DePaulo has called “singlism.” From our
earliest days, we learn that our worth is tied up in our ability to find a
mate; that marriage
marks the passage into mature adulthood and is our most
important adult relationship; and that we are not complete until we
find our other half. And then there is the issue of our "biological
clocks," an imperative which recent research suggests affects men too.
It's
no wonder that people feel rushed to settle down before they are ready, or
before they find the right match.
If
you have ever found yourself grappling with the question of whether it's better
to be alone, or to settle—which Gottlieb calls “one of the most complicated,
painful, and pervasive dilemmas many single [people] are forced to grapple
with"—read on. Here are four science-backed reasons why you should
consider holding out for a relationship that makes you truly happy:
Friday, April 4, 2014
Why Do We Take Personality Tests?
Posted by
Kate Reilly Thorson
I often get questions
from friends and family that they would like answered in a post. This month, my
post is inspired by a question from my grandmother. Kudos to my grandma for
asking a question about a popular trend on the internet!
![]() |
| Personality tests |
Personality tests are not new, but they have recently skyrocketed
in popularity on the internet. This week, Buzzfeed published 15 such tests in
one 24-hour period. It seems every day on my Facebook news feed, someone has
posted new results from one of these quizzes. Online personality tests have
expanded beyond the traditional format of telling us certain traits we possess,
although those do still exist (try here and here). Now, there are also tests
that give us information about ourselves by comparing us to people or characters we know
(“Which pop star should you party with?” or “Which children’s book character
are you?”) and by comparing specific behaviors
or knowledge to others’ (“How many classic horror films have you seen?” or “How
well do you know ‘90s R&B lyrics?”).
![]() |
| source |
Regardless of which type of personality test you prefer (I’m
not sure that all of these can be considered tests of personality, but we’ll
stick with that label for now), these tests have two things in common: they ask
us questions about ourselves, and then they tell us about ourselves. But aren’t
we the experts on ourselves? Why should we need to take these tests to figure out who we are? Though it seems that the clues to our personality simply lie within us, below I outline three reasons we might be
motivated to take personality tests anyway.
Friday, February 7, 2014
Ten Findings About Facebook for its 10th Birthday
Posted by
Kate Reilly Thorson
![]() |
| Happy Birthday, Facebook! |
1. Does Facebook help us feel better by fulfilling our need for social connection? The authors of one study text-messaged people five times per day for two weeks and asked people about their Facebook use and their well-being. The more people used Facebook at one time, the worse they felt the next time they were text-messaged. In addition, over the two weeks of the study, the more people used Facebook, the more their life satisfaction decreased.
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
The psychology within the biggest news of 2013
Posted by
Kate Reilly Thorson
![]() |
| source |
![]() |
| source |
1. New pope. When
the 266th pope of the Catholic Church was elected this year, many praised him
for his commitment to interfaith dialogue. His support of cross-religious
interactions underscores his belief that communication between members of
different groups can help to reduce prejudice and conflict. Seeking to heal
rifts among people due to religious differences or prior conflicts, the pope himself
has sought out personal relationships with many religious leaders across the
globe. He hopes that by encouraging his followers to establish similar
interfaith relationships, current tensions can be quelled and prejudice
alleviated.
| source |
Research on the intergroup contact hypothesis tells us that
the pope’s strategy is likely a good one. The basic prediction of the
hypothesis is that contact between people of different groups will usually
reduce prejudice. Forming relationships with members of another group can help people
learn more about a group, experience less anxiety about interacting with the group,
and feel more empathy for that group. All three of these outcomes can then diminish
prejudice. Some research has even shown that merely having a friend who
interacts with someone from another group can reduce prejudice (the extended
contact hypothesis). While it’s not always the case that intergroup contact
yields less prejudice, the pope does seem to be taking the right approach for
prejudice reduction by continuing to support interfaith dialogue.
Friday, January 3, 2014
Why Do We Blame Victims?
Posted by
Juli
Two months ago Jonathan Martin, a football
player on the Miami Dolphins, left the team due to mistreatment from teammates,
which included receiving threatening phone messages from another
player. The incident raised concerns about hazing within the NFL, but it also
prompted some to suggest that Martin himself bears at least partial
responsibility for his fate. For example, another NFL player stated in an interview that Martin is
"just as much to blame because he allowed it to happen" and should have
behaved like a man. Others argued that Martin was oversensitive and made himself an easy
target.
This sort of victim blaming is not unique to
bullying cases. It can be seen when rape victims' sexual histories are
dissected, when people living in poverty are viewed as lazy and unmotivated,
when those suffering from mental or physical illness are presumed to have
invited disease through their own bad choices. There are cases where victims
may indeed hold some responsibility for their misfortunate, but all too often
this responsibility is overblown and other factors are discounted. Why are we
so eager to blame victims, even when we have seemingly nothing to gain?
Friday, December 6, 2013
The Regifting Dilemma
Posted by
Kate Reilly Thorson
![]() |
| source |
I’m sure you’ve heard this debate before and what the
etiquette experts say: usually a range from a flat-out “no” to “only in rare
circumstances.” They claim the original gift-giver would feel disrespected if
he or she knew, as effort and money were put into the purchase and the
intention was not for the gift to go to another person. Note that this line of
reasoning about regifting relies on an assumption about how other people might
feel if they were involved in regifting. According to the experts, we shouldn’t
regift because the original gift-giver might be hurt. But
is this actually the case – are people really offended when someone regifts
their gift?
Friday, October 18, 2013
The Science of Touch and Emotion
Posted by
Amie
Today we have a guest post by a blogger for the Berkeley Science Review on the science of touch and emotion. BSR will be hosting an event about touch on October 27th. For more info, go to the bottom of this post.
![]() |
| Source |
If someone told you it was possible to communicate gratitude to
a complete stranger with a two second touch, would you believe it? Although the
power of speech allows us to imbibe great subtlety and complexity in our
messages, psychological researchers have demonstrated that something as complex
as gratitude or sympathy can be communicated with a simple touch.
In social species, prosocial emotions
are those that promote the well-being of the group. By engaging in acts of
trust and cooperation, social groups survive. Parents and offspring form
attachments, and individuals act in mutually beneficial, altruistic ways to sow
trust between one another. A growing number of studies on touch and emotion
reveal our deep-seated need for human contact and warmth. Touch may be the key
for communicating prosocial emotions, and for promoting group cohesion and
survival.
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Group gender composition: Does it matter?
Posted by
Kate Reilly Thorson
![]() |
| source |
An adult might have told me that was silly - how many boys
vs. girls were in my group didn’t matter. However, recent research suggests
that the gender composition of a group does matter. Though it doesn’t matter in
terms of impacting actual performance, it can influence how group members think
about one another and about their group as a whole. Because I love research
that examines people in their natural (or somewhat natural) environments when
they are interacting with other people, let’s take a look at how the
researchers demonstrated this.
Friday, December 7, 2012
Is it the thought that counts?
Posted by
Kate Reilly Thorson
![]() |
| source |
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
"She Asked For It": The Destructive Impact of Rape Mythology
Posted by
Juli
![]() |
| Source |
Monday, July 30, 2012
Wedding Bell Blues: Dealing with Post-Wedding Depression
Posted by
Amie
![]() |
| First comes marriage. Then what? |
Researchers Allison Scott and Laura Stafford interviewed a
group of newlywed women to try to answer just this question. Scott and Stafford
found that all of the women reported feeling bored post-wedding; They had
funneled all of their time and energy into planning their big day, and now they
weren’t quite sure what to do with themselves. But, being bored did not necessarily
mean being blue. Some women acknowledged that they felt a little bored, but
were not depressed. Other women were bored and depressed. So what distinguished
these two groups of women? Blue brides viewed
their weddings as the end goal. In contrast, happy brides viewed their weddings
as the start of a new chapter.
Monday, July 23, 2012
Perils of Positive Thinking
Posted by
Unknown
![]() |
| Fantasies are not the same as positive expectations. |
When you walk through the self-help aisle of any bookstore, you are likely to see plenty of books based on the notion that positive thinking is the key to getting what you want. The message is clear: if you want to achieve something, just keep telling yourself “I can!” and envision yourself accomplishing your goals. Success will surely come your way.
Not so, says years of psychological research. Certain kinds
of positive thoughts, known in the research as fantasies, can actually be
detrimental to performance. When we fantasize, we idealize our futures. We
imagine all the wonderful things we can achieve and the ease with which we can
achieve them. Fantasies are not based on past experiences, meaning that we can
have fantasies about achieving things for which we have no training or
practice. They are also not at all based on what we believe will happen. We are
fantasizing when we talk with our friends about what it might be like to win
the lottery or be an NBA superstar.
Monday, May 14, 2012
It's lonely at the top: Power makes you mistrusting
Posted by
Amie
![]() |
| It's lonely at the top |
Across five different studies, Inesi and her colleagues found that power lead people to make cynical attributions about the intentions behind another person’s kind acts. When a worker brings coffee for a boss, the boss may think that the co-worker is just trying to get ahead. And it doesn’t end there – because people who are more powerful are more likely to make these cynical attributions, believing those with less power are only using favors as a way to climb to the top, they are also less thankful, less trusting, and less likely to reciprocate the kind act. Gratitude, trust, and reciprocation are the cornerstones of relationship development. Relationships are hard, and without being able to trust the other person and return their favors, relationships are not likely to last long. Indeed, Inesi found that people who earned more than their spouses were less committed to their relationships, and this lack of commitment was explained by their mistrust of their partners’ intentions – the higher paid spouses believed their partners’ favors were more likely to be bestowed in a self-serving manner.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Can your phone cure depression?
Posted by
Juli
![]() |
| Source |
Aside from the obvious convenience of having constant access to email, what I really love are the apps. I love that I can check bus schedules, look up recipes on the go, and take vintage-y looking pictures (thanks Maya!). But as a psychologist, I'm especially excited by the idea that apps can be used in the service of mental health and well-being.
For example:
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
There's nothing wrong with turning red: The social functions of embarrassment
Posted by
Juli
![]() |
| Source |
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Class Warfare
Posted by
Unknown
"I think it's dangerous, this class warfare." -- Mitt Romney (2012 presidential candidate)
In the last week or so, everyday Americans have taken to the street, Wall Street to be exact, to express their discontent with the current economic climate. In short, the bottom 99% of Americans are upset about economic inequality, and rightly so. After all, American economic inequality is worse than every other developed country (we've discussed this inequality here and here). In particular, there seems to be striking inequality in salary between average workers and corporate CEOs (262:1 and rising).
Of course, not everyone is supportive of movements like these, which seek to diminish the pay disparities between the wealthy and the less-so. For instance, Herman Cain, the godfather of pizza (now current republican presidential candidate) said this about the protestors: "Don't blame Wall Street, and don't blame the big banks. If you don't have a job and are not rich, blame yourself." Apparently, a portion of people out there believe that people have personal responsibility for the amount of money they make and that wealth is gained through hard work, ability, and talent. But who exactly are these people?
In the last week or so, everyday Americans have taken to the street, Wall Street to be exact, to express their discontent with the current economic climate. In short, the bottom 99% of Americans are upset about economic inequality, and rightly so. After all, American economic inequality is worse than every other developed country (we've discussed this inequality here and here). In particular, there seems to be striking inequality in salary between average workers and corporate CEOs (262:1 and rising).
Of course, not everyone is supportive of movements like these, which seek to diminish the pay disparities between the wealthy and the less-so. For instance, Herman Cain, the godfather of pizza (now current republican presidential candidate) said this about the protestors: "Don't blame Wall Street, and don't blame the big banks. If you don't have a job and are not rich, blame yourself." Apparently, a portion of people out there believe that people have personal responsibility for the amount of money they make and that wealth is gained through hard work, ability, and talent. But who exactly are these people?
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Women better at judging men’s sexual orientation near to ovulation
Posted by
Anna Luerssen
![]() |
| source |
Living in the San Francisco Bay Area provides many benefits: good food, great activities, incredible landscape. For me, however, the Bay Area is SOO special, because it caters to a fabulously diverse array of residents. For example, each year San Franciscans can take to the streets to herald in spring during the Cherry Blossom Festival in Japantown, celebrate the beauty of leather during Folsom Street Fair, or stomp their feet and slap their thighs to the music at the completely free – Hardly, Strictly, Bluegrass. The variety of interests, cultures, traditions, and values in the Bay Area is a beautiful thing.
One interesting result of this diversity is that single, female San Franciscans are not often surprised when a man they’ve been eyeing all night, leaves the bar, with his boyfriend, not his girlfriend. San Francisco is, after all, home to The Castro - one of America’s first and arguably the best known, gay neighborhoods. Perhaps over the years women in San Franscisco have become especially adept at judging who is straight from who is gay (or who falls somewhere along the continuum). Interestingly, however, recent research has shown that women’s accuracy in judging male sexual orientation does fluctuate. Not by city (though someone should do that study) but instead by fertility (ability to conceive) across the menstrual cycle. Here’s the study…
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Narcissists know they're narcissists
Posted by
Anna Luerssen
![]() |
| source |
As this example demonstrates, there is often a large disconnect between narcissists’ self-perceptions (e.g. how positively he sees himself) and others’ perceptions of him (how positively his friends, coworkers, classmates, and acquaintances sees him). Interestingly, narcissists often create positive first impressions - they are initially rated as charming, likable, extraverted, and physically attractive (e.g. Back, Egloff, & Schmukle, 2010). However, overtime these impressions sour, with others progressively seeing them as disagreeable, emotionally unstable, and poorly adjusted (like my example above). Despite the deterioration of their reputation, narcissists often continue to see themselves in overly positive ways. This begs the question – are narcissists self aware? More precisely: do narcissists know that others don’t see them in such a positive light? Are they aware of their own negative characteristics? DO THEY KNOW THEY’RE NARCISSISTS?
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
What you expect is what you get: The "Pygmalion Effect"
Posted by
Amie
![]() |
| Source |
-Henry Ford
A couple of Fridays ago I posted a video about teacher who took her third grade class through an activity designed to help them learn about prejudice. When the students were told by their teacher that people with a certain eye color were smarter and better all around, they came to believe it and act in accordance. In the comments to this post, a reader noted that this video reminded him of the famous study by Rosenthal and Jacobson (1966) testing something they'd termed the “Pygmalion effect,” and so I thought I'd share that study with you today.
The Pygmalion effect? If you are not a fan of Eliza Doolittle and My Fair Lady, you might think this effect sounds like a medical condition that occurs after too much sun exposure (or is that just me?), but it’s not. What we’re talking about here is a simple case of self self-fulfilling prophecies (which Juli first wrote about here). Rosenthal and Jacobson were interested in the role of teacher expectancies in learning. What exactly does this mean? Imagine that a third grade teacher starts in the fall with a new class of students, a few of which had older sibling who passed through her class in previous years. She knows that those siblings were star students, and expects the younger siblings will also perform well. She might also talk with some of the second grade teachers who had had some of her students the previous year, and get all kinds of insider information about which students were top performers, and which straggled behind. Now let’s fast forward to the end of the year. Not surprisingly, the students whom the teacher had expected to do well met her expectations, and the stragglers continued to straggle behind. Did those star students perform well because they were smarter than the rest, as indicated by their siblings’ success and the reports of their second grade teachers? Or could it have been a much more sinister story - that they did so well simply because their teachers expected them to do well? This is exactly what Rosenthal and Jacobson wanted to find out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















