Friday, June 28, 2013

The Great Social Ladder of Our Lives

Last week I was on vacation in my hometown of Poway, CA. It's a little suburb outside of San Diego that boasts of being "The City in the Country" (basically that means we have both Starbucks and rodeo!). Whenever I go home, I see my family and I tend to fall into many of the same activities I did when I was in high school--mostly that involves eating Mexican food from the various eateries around the city (Cotijas, Albertos, Aibertos, Robertos, El Robertos, you get the idea). When I'm in Poway I think a lot about high school. One of the main aspects of high school--as we know from careful analyses of movies like the Breakfast Club and Mean Girls--is social status. That is, who is at the top of the social ladder, and how can we either be friends with those people, or if we aren't high status, how can we avoid the wrath of those at the top of the pecking order? I think my first interest in research on social hierarchy started in high school.

The truth is that social hierarchy isn't just confined to the high school cafeteria, but is instead a large part of our everyday social lives. Status hierarchies can be about workplace power, respect among peers, or stereotypes ascribed to us by virtue of our membership in a social category (e.g., gender and race). I believe that one of the, often overlooked, bases of status is social class--the money we make, education we obtain, and the job prestige we garner. Social class is the great social ladder that ranks us in society.



Most of the time we think we don't see class in our everyday lives. This is largely attributed to the fact that our relationships rarely cross social class boundaries. Think about it: The neighborhood you live in, the restaurants you attend, and your seat at a professional sporting event is sorted in terms of social class. We even date and marry within our own social class. We also rarely walk around displaying our degrees, bank accounts, and occupation titles. These conditions make us feel like class doesn't matter for our everyday life experience.

But if we were to look more closely at our social lives, there is a surprisingly large amount of information that reminds us and others of our position on the social ladder. The list of things that provides information about social class is quite long: The hybrid car we drive, the organic grass-fed bison we eat, the European vacation our family takes annually, the suit we wear to work, and the IPad we read this blog post on all send information about our social class to others. These signals rank us everyday on the social ladder of society, and either place us above or below other individuals.

That social class rank is signaled throughout social life has several consequences. The first is that other people will be able to accurately discern our rank in society based on very little information--even in the briefest of social exchanges. For example, 60 seconds of watching video of two strangers interacting was enough for a sample of undergraduates to accurately pinpoint the social class of the strangers in the videos (a correlation of r = .20). In more recent research, another sample of undergraduates was able to accurately discern social class rank based on photographs taken from Facebook.com profiles (a correlation of r = .30 to .40).

Signals of social class also provide us information about our value relative to others. Sometimes, if we pervasively see ourselves as low in rank relative to others, this can have detrimental consequences for our work and school performance. Imagine being a low-income student at a school surrounded by wealthier students. A low-income student's government subsidized school lunch and hand-me-down clothing provide information to his/her peers of lower social class rank, and this feeling of lower rank can hurt the academic performance of low-income students.

A study from Northwestern University demonstrated evidence of this pattern. In the research, middle class students at Northwestern University were either reminded of the school's location or that it was full of high ranking members of society. When informed that they were surrounded by people high on the social ladder, middle class students performed worse on a measure of executive functioning (e.g., the ability to plan ahead and shift attention between tasks).

A final consequence of the constant signaling of social class rank, is that high ranking members of society may come to justify their elevated social positions more strongly. Social psychology teaches of a phenomenon called cognitive dissonance--any discrepancies between attitudes leads us to want to reconcile those attitudes. If we constantly receive information that we are more valued in society than others--we have better cars, we live in better neighborhoods, we eat healthier foods, and we go on better vacations--this information will force us to explain our lofty positions and beneficial circumstances in a society where others suffer. Thus, high ranking individuals in society are particularly likely to believe that their elevated social position was achieved through a fair means of talent and effort, rather than through circumstance. Last week we covered evidence (here) suggesting that high status members of society endorse essentialist and meritocratic views of society's structure.

I hope this blog post has convinced you of the pervasive nature by which social class ranks us in society relative to others (If not, check out the paper it is based on here). This is the central idea behind much of my research, and one that I think guides my understanding of my own social life even today. What do you think rank does to you in your everyday life? Let me know in the comments!

Kraus, Michael W., Tan, Jacinth, J. X., & Tannenbaum, M. B. (2013). The Social Ladder: A Rank-Based Perspective on Social Class Psychological Inquiry, 24, 81-96 DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2013.778803

Johnson, S. E., Richeson, J., & Finkel, E. (2011). Middle-class yet marginal? The influence of socio-economic status at an elite university on executive functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 838-852 DOI: 10.1037/a0021956

11 comments:

  1. "organic grass-fed bison we eat"

    I'm feeling quite low on the social ladder now...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The veggie hierarchy is, of course, separate. .. and don't get me started about those vegans ;)

      Delete
  2. I always told Pete, Michael, I hated living in Pac Heights cause every day I'd come home in a relatively good mood feeling "successful" from a hard days work only to roll past 28 Porsches, etc. and literally hundreds of 10-100 million dollar homes and all of sudden I was struck by how "poor" I was...and missed my "middle class" neighborhood now relatively extinct in many parts of SF and Silicon Valley where I grew up....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's exactly what we find in lab studies: Whatever your upbringing, local relative rank changes how you feel about you. Thanks Cory!

      Delete
  3. Stress is one of the driving forces of the universe unfortunately. It can motivate us to get a job or cripple us onto the street with no food. Unfortunately, like you said one's socioeconomic position can make or break them. In lower-income home's there are more stressful daily occurrences and less help to deal with them. I think it is interesting that humans are so finely tuned in to such small clues that they are able to pick from a picture one's social status. I wonder if it is a built in defense mechanism? Knowing that one could be publicly embarrassed if they tried to invade another social-class.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Michael - I bet you could do one of these studies and come right back where you are looking merely at people's "retweets" and get a nearly immediate idea of their "social class." Would be an interesting one to read...

    Cory

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, and not just what you tweet about, but how you tweet might tell a story about rank as well (e.g., the types of words you use).

      Delete
  5. Thanks for the good information! I just become curious about in what ways the low class ppl would try to achieve the sense of power(which everyone yearns for). They may do so by just simply indorse the values of the powerful and feel life they are one of them, which may lead them to conform with the current system. Or I think gossiping about celebrities also could give them a sort of powerful feeling that they have some kind of controls over the celebrities' reputation and life. Thank you again for the post.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I remember a study on how social status is influencing the hormone status and immune system in Orang Utangs. i would'nt be surprised, if that mechanism also works in humans.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Having studied sociology, I am not surprised by the research. There is an overwhelming body of evidence demonstrating how socioeconomic status is a huge predictor in almost ever facet of human life ever studied. The most distressing statistics of all point to the enduring and intergenenrational nature of social status; contary to the Horatio Alger allegory of upward mobility,, in the US, a child born will most likely die poor. According to the most recent data, a child whose parents are in the bottom decile of SES, have only a 3% chance to reach the top decile in their lifetime.

    ReplyDelete
  8. In regard to SES and health, there is a perfectly linear relationship between the two; even a small increase in social position is associted with higher scores on both objective and subjective (self-reported) measures of health. As the previous commenters pointed out, it has to do with stress. As those,with low SES have higher levels of cortisol (a higher allostatic load) their long-term health suffers as a result. It is hypothesized that the degree of control over resources affects the stress hormone level. High status humans (and orangutans) control their environment more and therfore have a lower allostatc load.

    ReplyDelete