Last week the special issue on replication at the Journal of Social Psychology arrived to an explosion of debate (read the entire issue here and read original author Simone Schnall's commentary on her experience with the project and Chris Fraley's subsequent examination of ceiling effects). The debate has been happening everywhere--on blogs, on twitter, on Facebook, and in the halls of your psychology department (hopefully).
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Saturday, May 24, 2014
The Top Ten Worst Reasons to Stay Friends With Your Ex
Posted by
Juli
Your ex is your ex for a
reason. But he or she was also an important part of your life for a significant
amount of time, and it’s understandable to want to hold on to that relationship
in some capacity. Many former couples, whether they were dating partners or spouses, try to remain friends after a
break-up, and some are able to manage this transition successfully.
Research suggests, however,
that on average exes tend to have lower
quality friendships than platonic opposite sex friends who were
never romantically involved: they are less emotionally supportive, less
helpful, less trusting, and less concerned about the other person’s happiness.
This is especially true, not surprisingly, for former partners who were dissatisfied with the romantic relationship,
and when the break-up was not mutual.
The probability that a
friendship with an ex will be a positive rather than painful experience depends
in part on your motives, including the ones that you would rather not openly
acknowledge. Here are ten reasons that can get you into trouble.
Thursday, April 17, 2014
(Sample) Size Matters
Posted by
Unknown
![]() |
| Sample Size Matters |
Among the many suggestions for building a better psychological science, perhaps the simplest and most parsimonious way to improve research methods is to increase sample sizes for all study designs: By increasing sample size researchers can detect smaller real effects and can more accurately measure large effects. There are many trade-offs in choosing appropriate research methods, but sample size, at least for a researcher like me who deals in relatively inexpensive data collection tools, is in many ways the most cost effective way to improve one's science. In essence, I can continue to design the studies I have been designing and ask the same research questions I have been asking (i.e., business-as-usual) with the one exception that each study I run has a larger N than it would have if I were not thinking (more) intelligently about statistical power.
How has my lab been fairing with respect to this goal of collecting large samples? See for yourself:
Monday, April 7, 2014
4 Reasons Not to Settle in a Relationship
Posted by
Juli
Settling is an ugly, depressing word. Few
people would suggest outright that you should settle for less than you want and
deserve in a relationship. Even Lori Gottlieb, author of Marry Him:
The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough, disapproved of the
use of the word in her book title, a decision she said was made by her publisher.
But
the pressure to settle can be very real, even if it is not communicated
explicitly. People who are single after a certain age may be seen as "too
picky" and urged to lower their standards. Singles are also likely to face
social stigma due to their solo status, a phenomenon psychologist Bella DePaulo has called “singlism.” From our
earliest days, we learn that our worth is tied up in our ability to find a
mate; that marriage
marks the passage into mature adulthood and is our most
important adult relationship; and that we are not complete until we
find our other half. And then there is the issue of our "biological
clocks," an imperative which recent research suggests affects men too.
It's
no wonder that people feel rushed to settle down before they are ready, or
before they find the right match.
If
you have ever found yourself grappling with the question of whether it's better
to be alone, or to settle—which Gottlieb calls “one of the most complicated,
painful, and pervasive dilemmas many single [people] are forced to grapple
with"—read on. Here are four science-backed reasons why you should
consider holding out for a relationship that makes you truly happy:
Friday, April 4, 2014
Why Do We Take Personality Tests?
Posted by
Kate Reilly Thorson
I often get questions
from friends and family that they would like answered in a post. This month, my
post is inspired by a question from my grandmother. Kudos to my grandma for
asking a question about a popular trend on the internet!
![]() |
| Personality tests |
Personality tests are not new, but they have recently skyrocketed
in popularity on the internet. This week, Buzzfeed published 15 such tests in
one 24-hour period. It seems every day on my Facebook news feed, someone has
posted new results from one of these quizzes. Online personality tests have
expanded beyond the traditional format of telling us certain traits we possess,
although those do still exist (try here and here). Now, there are also tests
that give us information about ourselves by comparing us to people or characters we know
(“Which pop star should you party with?” or “Which children’s book character
are you?”) and by comparing specific behaviors
or knowledge to others’ (“How many classic horror films have you seen?” or “How
well do you know ‘90s R&B lyrics?”).
![]() |
| source |
Regardless of which type of personality test you prefer (I’m
not sure that all of these can be considered tests of personality, but we’ll
stick with that label for now), these tests have two things in common: they ask
us questions about ourselves, and then they tell us about ourselves. But aren’t
we the experts on ourselves? Why should we need to take these tests to figure out who we are? Though it seems that the clues to our personality simply lie within us, below I outline three reasons we might be
motivated to take personality tests anyway.
Wednesday, April 2, 2014
The Psychology of Economic Inequality: A Collection
Posted by
Unknown
Anyway, I hope you'll check out the piece and send me comments via twitter (@mwkraus). If you'd like to read more about this area of research, below I have collected four past PYM pieces on the topic.
Friday, March 28, 2014
Parenthood, Trial or Tribulation? Part 2
Posted by
Amie
On New Year’s Day I
became a parent, sparking my curiosity in the research on parenting and
well-being and inspiring a four-part series on parenthood and happiness. This
is the second post. Check out the first post here.
Are parents happier
than non-parents? Researchers have generally set about trying to answer
this deceptively simple question in three ways:
Are people with children happier than those without children?
This is the most common approach to research on parenthood
and well-being. In these studies, researchers typically tackle large datasets
with thousands of adults, comparing the well-being of people with children to
people without children. Although the approach is straightforward, the results
are mixed with some studies finding parents are happier than non-parents and other
studies find the reverse.
How can these studies with such a basic design find opposite
results? One large problem with this approach is that little work is
done to find out who exactly is making up these groups of parents and
non-parents. Focusing on the non-parents, only 15% of adults do not have
children, making them a small comparison group. More importantly, their reasons
for doing so may differ greatly. Young adults may not have children when they
take part in the research, but plan to have children later. Older adults may
not have children because they were not able to do so, or they may have
consciously made the choice to not have children. Imagine comparing a married 48-year
old with three children to a married 48 year-old with no children who spent
years and hard earned dollars fighting infertility and wishing to be a parent?
Who do you think is happier? Now imagine that the non-parent comparison is a 48
year-old who loves to travel, lives all over the globe and chose not to have
children because they wouldn’t fit a globetrotting lifestyle. Who do you think
is happier? In one study, mothers were no happier than women who chose not to
have children, but were significantly happier than infertile women (Callan,
1987). Choice plays an important role on the other side of the table as well—some
people become parents by choice while others find themselves in the unexpected
position of being a parent when they hadn’t intended it. How might choice
affect happiness among these different groups?
Are people happier after they have children than they were before they
were parents?
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Parenthood: Trial or Tribulation?
Posted by
Amie
This is the first post in a
four-part series on parenthood and happiness.
In my short time as a parent I have experienced great joy,
love and gratitude as well as intense worry, and sometimes even sadness. Happily,
as I sit here typing up this post with my two and a half month old swaddled
next to me on the couch, eyeing me trustingly as she falls in and out of sleep,
I can say that the balance tends to weigh strongly on the side of joy. But in
those moments where I don’t have the luxury to type up this post because I’m
tending to a crying child, or changing a dirty diaper, I dream of the freedom
of my former life and the balance is just a bit more evenly weighted.
And the one thing I know with certainty is that I still have
no clue what exactly I’ve gotten myself into. While my days often stretch out in
front of me with the sameness that comes from having an infant with simple
needs, I also know that she is growing and changing at a rapid pace. Each week
we are in uncharted territory as she learns to smile, sit, and eventually walk,
talk and push back as she becomes her own independent person.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







