tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6451967208270832502.post303383984644354009..comments2024-03-15T04:24:58.509-07:00Comments on Psych Your Mind: Quality v. Quantity in PublicationAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08931064542755278772noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6451967208270832502.post-79462094696238993952013-12-04T12:16:09.400-08:002013-12-04T12:16:09.400-08:00Mayo's comment seems to me to be about right, ...Mayo's comment seems to me to be about right, but I would instead say 2, or maybe even 3, not 1. Sometimes, a researcher issues 2 important publications in the same year. At the outermost limit, I might even admit the possibility of 3, inasmuch as the researcher doesn't control the publication-date.<br /><br />Setting that limit would also reduce co-authoring. This would be good, because almost all great works are solo-created. Assistants can be mentioned in acknowledgments, so that only main authors receive authorship-credit. Eric Zuessehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02476705883508590393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6451967208270832502.post-30035000405657059332013-06-20T21:11:00.103-07:002013-06-20T21:11:00.103-07:00I agree with you (though I'm not in psych). I&...I agree with you (though I'm not in psych). I've often thought that limiting people to one main publication a year would result in less junk publications.MAYO:ERRORSTAThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02967648219914411407noreply@blogger.com